Dyson Airwrap vs Shark Flexstyle hair styler assessment 2023

This text is a part of our sequence Battle of the Brands, by which we examine category-leading merchandise to their counterparts to find out which are literally value your cash.

Multi-styler know-how really modified the sport of at-home hair styling, and it simply so occurs that two main vacuum manufacturers are additionally main the cost of revolutionary hair instruments. The Dyson Airwrap Multi-Styler Full and the Shark Flexstyle Air Drying & Styling System permit customers to carry salon-level outcomes residence with a bevy of styling attachments and options. Each instruments mix drying and styling know-how to streamline your routine, so you’ll be able to blow dry, model and set your hair all with one machine.

On the floor, the Airwrap and Flexstyle have extra similarities than variations — however let’s see how they measure up.

Dyson’s Airwrap makes use of enhanced Coanda airflow know-how to make styling surprisingly fast and simple, whether or not you are going for a modern and straight look or a volumized and bouncy blowout.

A dryer, roller, volumizer and smoother multi function, the Shark Flexstyle additionally makes use of the Coanda impact for sensible hairstyling.

The Airwrap and Flexstyle are multi-styler instruments that supply related options. Each market themselves as hot-tool alternate options which can be more healthy for the hair than conventional hair dryers, curling irons or smoothing programs due to temperature-measuring know-how. In response to Dyson, the Airwrap measures airflow temperature greater than 40 instances per second, making certain that the machine stays below 302 levels Fahrenheit. The Flexstyle additionally continuously measures airflow temperature (Shark says 1,000 instances per second), and contains a no-heat setting so you need to use the machine to hurry up your air-drying time.

By way of feel and appear, each are modern and complicated. They take up about the identical quantity of area; nonetheless, the Airwrap comes with a handy storage case to maintain the attachments and machine organized between makes use of. Earlier than I get into the attachment comparisons, let’s check out the units’ respective specs.

I examined the instruments side-by-side by utilizing the Shark Flexstyle on the left aspect of my head and the Dyson Airwrap on the appropriate aspect of my head. As a result of my hair is of course stick-straight, thick and really lengthy, I usually have a lazy method to hairstyling and go for air drying most days due to the effort and time it takes to fully model my hair. I discovered each instruments straightforward to make use of and sturdy, and it was a breeze to modify from one attachment to the following, making it really feel like one smooth-sailing course of, relatively than an concerned routine with a bunch of separate steps.

The Airwap and Flexstyle each boast a hair drying function, which lets you lower down the variety of hair home equipment in your routine. (The 2 manufacturers additionally occur to make tech-driven hair dryers too, the Dyson Supersonic Hair Dryer and the Shark HyperAir Hair Dryer.) The Airwrap options one Coanda smoothing dryer attachment, whereas the Flexstyle’s dryer is constructed into the physique of the machine after which comes along with your chosen dryer attachments primarily based in your hair sort (the set for straight and wavy hair comes with a concentrator, whereas the set for curly and coily hair comes with the concentrator and a diffuser however no smoothing brush). Each suggest beginning with towel-dried hair, after which tough drying the hair to 80% earlier than utilizing one other styling attachment to complete your look. Every machine dried my hair to that 80% state in about 5 minutes, utilizing the max warmth and pace settings.

Between the 2, the Flexstyle’s drying function impressed me essentially the most. To activate its hair dryer, the highest of the machine rotates and locks in place at an angle. This provides extra management on your styling, and virtually feels such as you’re holding a typical hair dryer.

Since my hair is straight, I usually use a concentrator attachment on my common hair dryer to maintain it {smooth}. Having the concentrator attachment on the Flexstyle gave it the identical performance and management.

The Airwrap’s Coanda dryer attachment, alternatively, isn’t fairly as intuitive. It options two modes, Drying and Smoothing, with the latter using the Coanda know-how. The Drying mode contains a shot of centered airflow, nevertheless it didn’t present as a lot management as I’m used to with a daily hair dryer. In response to Dyson, the Smoothing mode is for already dry hair, is greatest for naturally straight or wavy hair and can assist tame flyaways. With the Airwrap’s different smoothing attachments, nonetheless, I didn’t see a necessity to make use of this on already dry hair, and as an alternative tried the Smoothing mode to complete drying my hair. Whereas my hair appeared straight and {smooth}, I didn’t discover any main distinction from how it could take care of utilizing a typical dryer.

The Flexstyle has one paddle brush attachment that options brief and lengthy bristles, whereas the Airwrap has two, the Mushy smoothing brush and the Agency smoothing brush. I used these to complete my regular straight styled look on 80% dry hair, after utilizing the dryer attachments.

On the Dyson’s smoothing attachments, the airflow is extra concentrated and makes use of the Coanda know-how to attact the hair, nonetheless, the Flexstyle’s dual-length bristles gripped my hair the very best out of any of the smoothing attachments. General, there weren’t any main variations within the closing outcomes throughout the units — each delivered a straight, modern look.

So as to add quantity to your ‘do, the Flexstyle presents a large-barreled oval brush, whereas the Airwap has a spherical volumizing brush. The Flexstyle’s volumizing attachment extra carefully resembles the fan-favorite Revlon One-Step Volumizer, whereas the Airwap’s barrel is nearer to a standard spherical brush.

Once more, I examined these on 80% dry hair. I discovered that the Dyson’s smaller barrel gave extra outlined curls, making my hair seem fuller and bouncier. The Shark’s barrel added some quantity and a little bit of bend to the ends of my hair, however not any super-defined model. Since I’ve thick hair, I think about the Flexstyle would make extra of a noticeable distinction on superb hair.

For me, the Dyson undoubtedly received this spherical. The spherical brush was straightforward to make use of and gave a refined blowout with minimal effort — I really love the outcomes each time. Up to now, I had tried maneuvering a spherical brush with a standard hair dryer and it was all the time a wrestle. My hair would get caught within the brush and I might in the end hand over and simply go along with straight hair. The Airwrap’s spherical drying brush combines the 2 steps, and my hair pulls by means of simply. I by no means thought I’d have the ability to give myself a blowout in below quarter-hour, however right here we’re!

The Coanda impact curlers are what make these hair instruments magic. Each the Shark and Dyson function this know-how, which mechanically wraps the hair across the barrel of the roller because the airflow dries and units the hair. In contrast to the wand curlers of my youth (those that got here with a glove to guard your hand as you maintain your hair to the 400-degree device), there’s no fear of burning any digits with these. The Flexstyle has two 1.25-inch barrels, which direct the curls clockwise or counterclockwise. The earlier mannequin of the Airwrap additionally had separate barrels to modify the path of the curls, however the present model is ready to swap the path of how the hair is wrapped in a single barrel (a knob on the prime could be twisted to decide on the path). Now, the Airwrap comes with two sizes of barrels, a 1.2-inch and 1.6-inch, each with this rotating tip. Dyson additionally presents two lengths of curling barrels, with one made particularly for lengthy hair. For this story, I examined the Airwrap’s 1.2-inch barrel towards the Flexstyle’s curling barrel, since they’re closest in measurement.

As with the opposite attachments, the Flexstyle and Airwrap basically supplied the identical operate with the curlers. Nevertheless, I discovered that the Dyson dealt with my thick hair significantly better than the Shark. I used to be in a position to model my hair with the Airwrap at medium pace, excessive warmth, working in 1-inch sections and it created voluminous, unfastened curls. For the Flexstyle, I began out with the identical settings — medium pace, excessive warmth, 1-inch sections — however needed to swap it to excessive pace as a result of it was struggling to wrap my hair. Even then, the curls weren’t as outlined as with the Airwrap.

By the tip of the day, the aspect styled with the Airwrap had relaxed into waves, whereas the aspect styled with the Flexstyle appeared just about straight.

Whereas the Flexstyle’s hair drying options prime that of the Airwrap, Dyson’s machine outperformed it total. The Airwrap’s capacity to create next-to-professional-level kinds that final — in below 20 minutes — is actually spectacular.

Taking hair sort into consideration, I may see that the Flexstyle would work with finer, lighter hair. Since I’ve thick, heavy hair — and a number of it — it normally takes extra time and energy to get kinds to set.

In fact, price range comes into play. With the Airwap at twice the value of the Flexstyle, I might nonetheless suggest Shark’s choice for these in search of a extra budget-friendly multi-styling device.